Date
Thursday September 6, 2018
NOTE: Day before ETH Berlin
Venue
Full Node
Host: @mariapaulafn (Golem/ organizing ETHBerlin )
Facilitators: @fubuloubu @RexShinka @rpavlovs @captnseagraves (SecurEth Foundation)
Schedule and Format
Location: Full Node, Skalitzer Strasse 85-86, 10997 Berlin, Germany 0800-0900 - Venue Opens, light refreshments 0900-0920 - Introductions & Agenda 0920-1020 - Lightning Talks Part 1 Gerard and Lukas - Good Testing implies good code Yondon Fu -...
Attendees
At capacity for event: 110 attendees
Further Discussion
I’m concerned that the need for security and correctness in smart contract engineering is being outweighed by the pressure to deliver highly complex systems to anxious ICO investors.
Following conversations at EdCon in Toronto, there’s a clear need for a gathering specifically focused on smart contract security. Here is my best attempt at outlining what I think this event would look like, as well as my open questions.
Goals
To share knowledge to prevent and mitigate security risks facing smart…
https://discourse.secureth.org/t/eth-berlin-unconference-workshop-topics/45/18
https://discourse.secureth.org/t/eth-berlin-unconference-lightning-talks/20/37
7 Likes
I know the guys at Chainshot would be very keen to attend here, please consider them. E-mail is dan@chainshot.com
IMO the first option of the UnConference sounds better but both options can be good.
@jpitts Can we create polls?
Yes that’s possible by clicking on options in the toolbar and then build poll.
Unconference
Focused Unconference
Other
2 Likes
These options don’t match the OC. Maybe it’s been edited?
I’m in favor of more discussion, fewer talks.
Talks which share experiences and learning, which then encourage follow up conversation are probably best.
1 Like
How do we best facilitate that?
maurelian:
I’m in favor of more discussion, fewer talks.
Talks which share experiences and learning, which then encourage follow up conversation are probably best.
I was thinking about having talks planned like you stated, but maybe another idea would be to do a more dynamic mapping process EIP0-style of figuring out all the angles of what an audit should be and what is in scope vs. out of scope of an audit? Just have a really good philosophical discussion about it, at least for part of the time.
Thoughts?
Yeah I think it was edited but I can’t edit the poll…
GNSPS
June 20, 2018, 6:17pm
10
I’m 100% going as well. as I’m sure are other people from Diligence. Happy to help with logistics and content.
2 Likes
Awesome! Can you edit the wiki above to add your attendance?
Someone was having problems yesterday. We may need a better mechanism for the RSVP list
I would love to participate in this event. Is it ok to simply invite myself by adding me to the list in the wiki?
It seems new users can’t edit the wiki post.
I’ll be in attendance as will several of my coworkers: Ryan Stortz (Trail of Bits)
Your name has been added. Looking forward to it.
Your name has been added. Great to have you guys. Can you give me the names of the other attendees?
Jay Little (Trail of Bits)
Sophia d’Antoine (Trail of Bits)
Evan Sultanik (Trail of Bits)
Felipe Manzano (Trail of Bits)
Gustavo Grieco (Trail of Bits)
Josselin Feist (Trail of Bits)
JP Smith (Trail of Bits)
Ben Perez (Trail of Bits)
Gangs all there. Excellent. It will be a hoot. Did you check out guidelines.secureth.org yet? Comments welcome
Please add me to the attendee list:
Patrick MacKay (Runtime Verification, Inc.)
Please add further discussion on the agenda of this gathering to the following thread in the SecurEth discourse: https://discourse.secureth.org/t/ethberlin-security-unconference-agenda-post-topic-here/
Patrick you are in!. Check out the discourse for topics and agenda.