EIP-7607: Fusaka Meta EIP

EIPs EIPs Meta
1

Fusaka Planning Timeline

  • March 24: deadline for EIPs to be Proposed for Inclusion in Fusaka
  • March 31: deadline for client teams to share their preferences about scope, including which EIPs they think should be Declined for Inclusion.
  • April 10: Fusaka scope frozen
9 Likes
3

Fusaka scope preferences

Consensus Layer client teams

Grandine

Lighthouse

Lodestar

Prysm

Nimbus

Teku

Execution Layer client teams

Besu

Erigon

Geth

Nethermind

https://x.com/m25marek/status/1896911082628727213

Reth

Layer 2s

Base

Community

4

Base’s preferences for Fusaka: blob/acc: Achieving more blob space in 2025

1 Like
5

Cross-linking a thread highlighting concerns about EOF: Ethereum is turning into a labyrinth of unnecessary complexity with EOF - Let's reconsider EOF

3 Likes
6

What‘s the current thinking around the blob target increase? The fee accrual to Ethereum stakers is now 10x less after blobs and the blob fee market has just kicked in a few months ago.

It was widely criticized that the too high blob fee target meant that Ethereum didn‘t capture any value for a long time as price discovery didn‘t happen. Today ETH is mechanically worth less because of that change. Sentiment is down and analysts dislike the project.

Why should we just pass out a free blobs voucher to Base et al when it would be much more beneficial to leave the target where it is right now so that more competition happens around DA?

Ethereum is poised for significant growth, with the potential to one day serve a vast global user base seeking a freer, more open economy. Right now, blob usage has been saturated for several months, resulting in higher fees for users and constrained ecosystem growth. Even though Pectra increase will offer some relief, the expected increase in blob count won’t be enough to handle explosive growth as more rollups come online.

This is a crazy claim. Where is the evidence for this? I actually had to go to Basescan myself because this seemed like such a crazy claim that I thought I was the crazy one. I picked a random transaction for an ERC20 transfer and voila: $0.000708

resulting in higher fees for users and constrained ecosystem growth.

It costs a fraction of a cent to transact on L2s like Base. No user is held back by transacting on Base for $0.000708 or even double or triple that. wat

7

Personal scope preference

Roadmap focus

  • The Surge - L2 scaling
    EIPs should generally only be considered for inclusion if they significantly move the roadmap forward.

Scheduled for inclusion (SFI)

Considered for inclusion (CFI)

  • EIP-7892 Blob Parameter Only Hardforks: L2 scaling
  • EIP-7839 Unified Network Configuration: reduce config complexity
  • EIP-7910 eth_config JSON-RPC Method: reduce config issues

Denied for inclusion (DFI)

3 Likes
8

@potuz personal take
https://x.com/potuz_eth/status/1904138823606386985

9

Besu’s preferences: Besu Fusaka Position Paper - HackMD

Shared here: https://x.com/HyperledgerBesu/status/1904936507858710768

1 Like
10

Erigon’s preferences: A Lean Approach to Fusaka: Our Stance on a Minimal Fork – Erigon.tech

Shared here: https://x.com/ErigonEth/status/1903769491072221365

11

Prysm’s preference: Prysm Recommendation for Fusaka - HackMD

1 Like