Assuming a cross layer upgrade, any H-star name will be combined with the execution layer name BogotĂĄ in a portmanteau (Portmanteau generator), so any name choice should also consider this.
(Apologies if I am stepping on the process for selecting star upgrade names, Iâm not a core dev)
We should probably also evaluate how the portmanteau sounds. Something like Heka + BogotĂĄ â HekotĂĄ has a nice futuristic ring to it. Keeping the name short and pronounceable matters.
I would be careful with the list of names from wikipedia because star names can be different in various registries and some names are not recognized as regularly used names by IAU.
We already made this mistake in Glaos which is hard to find under this name in most registries. Letâs choose a name thatâs more widely recognized like stars we did before, ideally something that might be easier to find on the night sky.
Here is a list that mostly overlaps with the wikipedia source but I would take a deeper look into context of each star, whether they are cool enough to be candidates Star Names That Start With H - Little Astronomy
Edit: Accidentally deleted my comment With a quick check in Stellarium, I believe considered stars are recognized with these names, although there are some alternatives.
Also considering observability, my favorite would be Hamal, it should be visible even with a naked eye in the night sky. Helvetios is also good option but only visible with a telescope
Even though the meaning of the star name Helvetios matters, whatâs more important is how well it blends with BogotĂĄ.
I think Helvota (Helvetios + BogotĂĄ) sounds really good. It feels smooth, balanced, and easy to pronounce, keeping a touch of the original elegance of Helvetios while fitting naturally with BogotĂĄ.
I would like to request to change the star selected for the fork after Glamsterdam. So far we have always selected name of stars that are officially listed in the Internstional Astronomers Union catalog, which is maintained by a list of scientific members from all accross the globe.
Heka is not in that list, and if we do not follow a minimum standard then we risk ending up with very weird names found in an obscure corner of the internet. Nothing against the name itself, just about the methodology.
Funny enough, all the other names proposed in the OP are in the IAU catalog, Heka is the only impostor in that list.
is likely too late to do that, given All Core Devs selected that name and the Meta EIP has been created.
Well, I donât agree.
I donât want to be annoying on this, but if we are still discussing which EIPs go into Glamsterdam or not (which is the real critical part of a fork), I donât think it is âtoo lateâ to correct the name of a hard-fork that might come in 2027.
If you donât mind I would like to redo the poll with the same list of options, except Heka, and ask core developers to do the vote again.
@leobago you can add it to the ACDC #171 agenda to see if there is interest in choosing a different name to Heka. All Core Devs select the name, the poll is for signaling purposes.