This is the new discussion link if Update EIP-1046: Move back to Review and add myself as author by Pandapip1 · Pull Request #6563 · ethereum/EIPs · GitHub is merged.
Old discussion link:
1 Like
With the proposed expansion to include ERC721.the title should change.
I regularly wish I had got token level metadata included in ERC721: EIP 821: Distinguishable Assets Registry (Contract for NFTs) · Issue #821 · ethereum/EIPs · GitHub
That would be a great EIP. Go ahead and write it!
Is there any statistics on how many ERC20 token are using this ERC1046?
Considering the major ones, I am not sure it got any adoption traction.
Also advising not using name() goes against the autowrapping multichain protocols like xERC20.