Think of an (a) open source service token and an (b) ISP wallet, authority.
I think upgradeContract permissionToken permission balance is useful for an RLP NodeList Open Source Authority for (A) programmatic minting (“gateway”…) or (B) wallet recovery and generation. The custody differs for the service, like Digital Ocean, who does provision (a) deployment logs for their buildpack apps (i.e. ex-droplet). Phone Authentication, the app developer, and the Identity Provider can (b) begin the chain track implementation, or recover any publicId balances (using a dashboard like Firebase/Identity Platform, and setting allowed domains), not mint.
This recoverable open source layer I want to use in front of USDC tbills or even better, capital currency stock; I’m not sure why ACH reconciliation and card issuers won’t allow nonfinancial banks unless we use blockchain (i.e. Mastercard, potentially non-U.S.), but the Ummah can only take introspectively equal and full measure, as ability makes need and takes from market, and I agree bond-purchases are stolen from an in balanced market towards the right to ownership. So here is either a coincidental or compelled use case need, but I’m not forfeiting my desire to use ACH even without Ethereum in this statement; this use case is important - as we likely all know - for wallet custody recovery, generally.