Transaction replay blanket ban is wrong - needed for keyless contract deployment

[SKYBITDev3]

@MicahZoltu

This is why the “Deterministic Deploy With Init Function” is a really bad idea

I agree with you.

Though the point I was trying to make is that there could updated versions of the Deterministic Deployment Proxy (e.g. one that I’ve made) - the old one from 4y ago by you / Nick shouldn’t have to be the only one that ever exists.

@MicahZoltu

The address of a contract deployed by Deterministic Deployment Proxy is a function of the code being deployed. With Nick’s fork, it is a function of the code being deployed and the provided salt. The deployer’s address doesn’t play any role in the contract’s address.

For general purpose contract deployment, the deployer’s address should be included to prevent front-running by others, so I’ve made an updated version which I’ve described in Updated MicahZoltu's / Arachnid's Deterministic Deployment Proxy