What stakeholder category do you represent?
e.g. wallet devs, DEXs, bridges
Commit-Boost and Fabric
What do you view as the top priority theme in this fork & why?
e.g. censorship resistance, scaling the L1, improving UX, etc.
We’re extremely excited to see ePBS and 6s slots pushing L1 scaling but our heart truly lies with FOCIL. Censorship resistance is one of the features that drew many of us to Ethereum in the first place. In fact a flavor of FOCIL was one of the first Commit-Boost module’s developed: il-boost/src at main · eserilev/il-boost · GitHub.
Doubling down on CR in Glamsterdam makes sense to us in spirit and in strategy. We’re witnessing a complete renaissance of Ethereum as institutions begin to adopt the technology. It’s never been more important to enshrine one of our most important values today, not after it’s too late.
Which EIP(s) do you favor as a headliner for Glamsterdam?
note: the process is aiming for one EIP each for the consensus and execution layers
EIP-7805 FOCIL
If known, what specific impacts would this have on your community?
e.g. this EIP would enable our users to…
This EIP would ensure censorship resistance remains a top priority regardless of how the builder market ends up developing in the future.
Does anything make this an urgent feature for you or your community?
e.g. not urgent, but it would streamline…
Not urgent but we believe it’s now or never.
The leading headliners among client teams are described in a series of blog posts listed here. Do you have any concerns about any particular proposal?
e.g. they’re all good eggs
They’re all great proposals, in fact we’ve written about how ePBS can remain compatible with the L1 preconf specs from Fabric here: Notion