I collected some dissenting opinions at the end of EIP 3074 is unsafe, unnecessary, puts user funds at risk while fragmenting UX liquidity and the wallet stack by the founders of Argent, Gnosis, and the CTO of Ledger.
At least some of the “popular support” was from devs who didn’t understand that in practice, the power of EIP 3074 would only be in the hands of the very few “whitelisted” invokers (eg MetaMask) because it is so incredibly unsafe to authorize anyone else to even pay for your gas with EIP 3074’s all or nothing security model.
Do you really want to build the right thing or do you just want to win? If you want the best arguments to win, why do you vote on having the ACD breakout call on the future of AA when the architect of AA can’t make it to the call? Why do you take advantage of the AA team not being able to make it to Istanbul to FUD AA as slow and complex? Why don’t you invite the AA team to the backroom conversations where you speak with the authority of the majority execution client with the other execution client teams?