New users can’t create topics.
Spend some time reading first. Especially look at EIPs & ERCs
3 Likes
It is best to create a discussion here first, to see if there is support for what you are proposing.
1 Like
@abcoathup hi, i have created a PR(id 624) for my new EIP there. what should i do next, as i can’t create a new discussion here.
You will be able to create a topic once you have spent more time reading here. Read more topics in ERCs
1 Like
hi, i have successfully created my topic. here is the link:
also seems that no one is picking up my PR for the next progress. what am i supposed to do then ?
@frankmint2024 there is only a small number of ERC editors (I am not an editor), so it can take some time to get reviewed. In the meantime, ensure that the validator doesn’t raise any errors, fix any issues (e.g. change the use of the word EIP to ERC).
There is a fortnightly office hours that you could attend: EIP Editing Office Hour Meeting 45 · Issue #360 · ethcatherders/EIPIP · GitHub
Thanks for the tip. I am the creator of E.I.P.-8900: Transparent Financial Statements and I will start the discussion here until I am able to start a post.
E.I.P.-8900: Transparent Financial Statements:
Abstract
This proposal defines a standard A.P.I. that enables E.V.M. Blockchain-based companies (or also called “Protocols”) to publish their financial information, specifically Income Statements and Balance Sheets, on-chain in a transparent and accessible manner through Solidity Smart Contracts. This standard aims to emulate the reporting structure used by publicly traded companies in traditional stocks markets, like the S.E.C. 10-Q filings. The financial statements include key information, namely as Revenue, Cost of Goods Sold, Operating Expenses, Operating Income, Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (E.B.I.T.D.A.) and
Earnings Per Token (E.P.Share-Token), allowing investors to assess the financial health of blockchain-based companies in a standardized, transparent, clear and reliable format.
Motivation
The motivation of this E.I.P. is to Bring Seriousness to the CryptoCurrencies Investments Market. Currently, the situation is as follows:
Most ERC-20 Tokens representing E.V.M. Blockchain-based companies (or also called “Protocols”), DO NOT work the same way as a Publicly Traded Stock that represents a Share of ownership of the equity of that such company (so the user who buys a Protocol’s ERC-20, is also now a share-holder and co-owner of the business, its profits and/or its dividends), but rather function as “Commodities” such as oil; they are consumable items created by said E.V.M. Blockchain-based company (or “Protocol”) to be spent in their platform. They are Publicly Traded and advertised to be representing the underlying Protocol like a Share, working in practice the same way as a Commodity and without any Public, Transparent and Clear Financial Information as publicly traded stocks have.
Added to that, most token research analysis reports that can be currently found on the internet are informal Substack or Twitter posts, with lots of abstract explanations about the features of the said Protocol to invest in, that lack of transparent financial numbers and factual financial information, that are made by anonymous users without real exposed reputations to affect.
This E.I.P. will improve that by giving users and investors transparent, clear and factual financial information to work with when analyzing as a potential investment the such
E.V.M. Blockchain-based company that implements this E.I.P. in their Solidity Smart Contracts, and that will generate Trust, Transparency and Seriousness in the CryptoCurrencies Investments Market long term.
FEEDBACK:
Please, everyone is invited to respectfully and constructively provide useful feedback. Have a nice day! 
@Nachoxt17 you just need to read multiple topics before you can post.
Please note, EIP/RIP/ERC numbers are assigned by editors & associates and are now sequential. You don’t get to pick your own.
1 Like
already waiting for some days. why still no code owner review the PR, and also the checklist is always waiting to be reported ?
Thanks for the tip! I assigned to my E.I.P. the number given by the Pull Request (#8900). As far as I am aware that is how the EIP-1 defines it. In my humble opinion, the EIP-1 is not clear enough about where the number comes from; also the eth-both required me to have a number in the description in order to pass the Format tests.
From: EIP-1: EIP Purpose and Guidelines
Assign an EIP number (generally incremental; editors can reassign if number sniping is suspected)
EIP/ERC numbers are assigned manually by editors & associates. They are now sequential and no longer the PR number.
ERCs need to be created in the ERC repo: GitHub - ethereum/ERCs: The Ethereum Request for Comment repository
1 Like
It could be weeks or even longer. There is only a small number of ERC editors (I am not an editor).
Thanks for the reply.
1 Like
Hey gang, I’m trying to submit a new discussion on the ERC topic for an ERC proposal, but I don’t have posting bits. I did the tutorial with Discord but not allowed yet to post.
What are the other actions I need to complete? 
1 Like
@amhed I have increased your privileges so you should be able to create a topic now.
Generally you need to read multiple topics to gain access to this.
1 Like
Hi everyone, I’m doing a research on how smart contract devs integrate innovative ideas that are referenced in draft stage EIPs without breaking core functionality. Do you think it’s interesting?
I’m trying to understand the process behind EIPs better—where’s the best place to start for a beginner? Any tips or resources would be great!
Hi
I’ve been working for a start-up that is building a platform to tokenise real world assets. One of the first questions we wanted to answer is, what happens to the tokens when someone passes away? We couldn’t find anything in the current Ethereum EIP/ERCs that solved this problem, so we tried solving this ourselves.
We believe our “Bequeathable tokens” solution has the potential to become a standard (with a bit of polish from you guys), as surely we cant be the only ones wrestling with this issue.
We’ve already drafted the ERC, and have a working example implementation with unit tests, but are now looking for community feedback to see if it’s something that others would find useful before doing the PR.
I know I’m new here, but it would be nice if I could start a topic on Bequeathable tokens.