Thanks that’s great to hear!
This standard is general enough that it could be used like that, returning information at keys like bytes32("name")
, bytes32("description")
. We could think about defining a basic set in this ERC under a nesting like metadata.name
, metadata.description
, or create a separate EIP that requires this one that focuses on defining them (can require that anything under metadata
is used as a top level metadata key and display type should be hidden). There is a strong focus on “traits” because they can influence the NFT’s value and specific ones may have to be checked during order fulfillment.