@xinbenlv do you have any plans to revisit this ERC?
My two cents, working on an implementation of EIP-7540: Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults that wants to use endorsements for enabling a use case where the owner != msg.sender, is that the proposal @joeysantoro made in his comment above would be a significant improvement to this ERC. Mainly because it also makes it immediately backward compatible with other standards such as ERC-4626 deposit/withdraw/mint/redeem calls