As long as these arguments are not included in the EIP you are just hallucinating what you personally feel are the motivations for Dankrad to propose the EIP. Not meant as an offense ofc, but this is just structurally what can be observed.
Btw. I also don’t think it is enough for @dankrad himself to state in the comments here or elsewhere what his motivation is for submitting. This has to be part of the EIP IMO. Otherwise Twitter etc. is going to front run the EIP with strawmans