Oh yes, I’ve done some reading in the 3 days before u replied; however my Motivating Q is still the same.
I know there’s a Cryptographic hash (u just added it’s SHA256), the points r:
1-The degree of security depends on the object kind and to what limit it could be uniquely identified, ie I still see u can’t just sell they’re all the same level of security.
Ex.
-if u sign a real estate contract with say SHA256, then ur ownership is as secure as SHA256
-but if u used it to sign a photo or even a DNA, u should add to ur calculations the accuracy of ur presentation of the image(the way u uniquely identity it), or the accuracy of DNA (I know DNA is like 0.9999…9 accurate)
.
2- For this specific case of the Beeple pic, as it includes smaller images inside it, I’m asking what exactly did they hash?
*If they hashed every small image, howcome one of the smaller ones got a new NFT?
*If they did not, do u think the owner who paid 69m$ is aware of that?or thinks he bought them all?
1 Like