Dapplets: Rethinking Dapp Architecture for better adoption and security

[Ethernian]

@Arachnid

Smaller standards are generally better, and more likely to get reviewed and implemented.

My belief is different: adoption of the standard is not a function of its size, but of the strength of incentives to implement relative to efforts needed. Enabling legacy sites, Dapplets creates sufficient incentive for adoption, I believe.

@Arachnid

And separation of concerns is good too.

It may be a valid point. What concerns do you see unreasonably mixed now?

[Arachnid]

@Ethernian

My belief is different: adoption of the standard is not a function of its size, but of the strength of incentives to implement relative to efforts needed. Enabling legacy sites, Dapplets creates sufficient incentive for adoption, I believe.

Larger standards increase the effort required to implement, too.

@Ethernian

It may be a valid point. What concerns do you see unreasonably mixed now?

Anything explicitly concerned with audit.

[RSivakov]

Очень интересная тема. Когда-то мы с напарником тоже экспериментировали на эту тему (только дальше эти действия подписывались пин-кодом на банкомате, т.е. не метамаск, но, немного похожа логика =))]
Это очень старые первые наброски.

[Ethernian]

@RSivakov

(только дальше эти действия подписывались пин-кодом на банкомате, т.е. не метамаск, но, немного похожа логика =))]

How it is related to my staff? Unclear…