ACDC #155 Summary
Action items
- Pectra timelines
- Mainnet date confirmed to be May 7 2025
- Client releases by April 21 2025
- Pectra mainnet blog post by April 23 2025
- Add contacts per client team for Pectra mainnet observation
- Fusaka SFI EIPs
- EIP-7594 (PeerDAS)
- EIP-7892 (BPO)
- Fusaka CFI EIPs
- EIP-7917 (Proposer lookahead stability)
- Other PFI Fusaks EIPs are moved to DFI status.
Summary
Pectra
- See timelines in action items.
- Testing update from Mario:
- Teams writing and reviewing new tests
- All tests running against all clients
- Increased confidence in test coverage compared to previous weeks
- Incidence response document needs client team contacts added via PR
- See link in action items.
PeerDAS
peerdas-devnet-6
launched ~1 week ago- Some issues with EL processing times, investigation ongoing
- EIP-7892 (BPO) configuration format:
- Will use YAML “list of records” structure on CL side.
- Configuration to be included in main config file, not separate
- No CLI override functionality planned for now
- Discussed plans for
fusaka-devnet-0
to launch by late May- Follows
peerdas-devnet-6
spec along with EIP-7892
- Follows
Fusaka
- Agreed to move EIP-7892 to SFI as part of the Fusaka blob scaling strategy
- Then discussed on Fusaka CFI EIP set
- Everyone agreed to focus primarily on PeerDAS and blob scaling on the CL side
- Only once Fusaka devnets with the current SFI set is stable, would we consider moving any additional EIPs from CFI to SFI.
- EIP 7917 (proposer lookahead stability):
- Early investigation shows implementation is small to medium complexity
- Potuz highlights this EIP does touch the beacon state, where as the current SFI set does not; given the centrality of this data structure it does imply this EIP would add significant surface area to Fusaka overall.
- Given this, client teams agreed to DFI at first sign of complications with weak support to CFI today.
- EIP 7688 (SSZ stable containers):
- Decided to handle in future fork since no immediate proof impacts with the current SFI set
- Participants reiterated the focus on blob scaling and so elected to not CFI today.
Fusaka builder API discussion
- Current concerns with builder API scalability for high blob counts:
- large response sizes, esp. as blob counts become higher with Fusaka in a synchronous API
- Concern for resource constraints for smaller nodes when processing large responses
- Potential solutions discussed:
- Remove API response entirely (relay handles gossip)
- Keep status quo (relay returns all data)
- Hybrid approach (return payload, separate blob distribution)
- and potentially leverage existing “get blobs” functionality to assist with distribution
- Teams agreed API needs revision for Fusaka; next step is to get input from builder/relay community