Process Improvement


About the Process Improvement category (1)
When does contentious review happen in Core EIPs? (19)
Governance concerns after listening to ~all ProgPow discussions on Core Dev calls (8)
Is it ERC-20, ERC20 or ERC 20? (2)
MathTeX in EIPs (2)
Community guidelines or rules (2)
More frequent, smaller hardforks vs. less frequent, larger ones (16)
Reviewing the current EIP process ( 2 ) (28)
Patent Covenant for EIP submissions? (9)
Governance Voting Concept ( 2 ) (23)
Higher standards for EIPs (14)
CoinDesk article about "stuck ether", and efforts to unstuck the process ( 2 ) (30)
Linux Foundation mailing list for ethereum-devs (3)
New RSS feed [PR for editor review] (1)
A Post Mortem Report: The Constantinople Ethereum Hard Fork Postponement (5)
Core devs discussion about a vulnerability in Constantinople, delay of the upgrade (6)
Highlighting the other standards & specs that make up Ethereum (10)
#EIP0: Ethereum "Project Management" Governance ( 2 ) (29)
How to get community involvement in your Magicians' Ring (7)
Ethereum Magicians EPICs for 2019 (2)
Thoughts on EIPs and interoperability (1)
Proposal: Add Ring tags to EIPs; solicit comments from Ring(s) (5)
Strange Loop: An Ethereum Governance Framework Proposal ( 2 ) (27)
Issues we discovered in the Ropsten Constantinople hard fork (10)
Decentralizing EIP workflow (9)
EIP process should embrace a model like TC39 (3)
Ethereum 2.0 Upgrade Process (1)
Overwhelmed by number of EIPs, ERCs, etc... Better structure required? (4)
[RFC] Advanced Blockparty: a solution for overbooked meetups (3)
Directory of rings (5)